The Benefits of Different Leadership Styles

The Benefits of Different Leadership Styles

A leader can be anyone with significant talent, experience and capability to rise above and lead based on their strengths, not a position title.

Usually, managers will allow different leaders to come forward and inspire the rest of the employees to advance to the next level.

However, different situations call for different leadership styles.

This is important to keep in mind as some styles may not be as effective as others depending on the circumstances.

While there are several variations of different leadership styles, they stem from three basic approaches: Authoritarian, Laissez-faire and Democratic.

As mentioned before, each of these leadership styles may be effective depending on the situation.

A true leader will be able to recognize when to use each style in order to drive the best results.

Here are the following benefits for different leadership styles:


1. Democratic/participative leadership

The democratic style requires a special type of leader, but it also requires a special group of participants.

Everyone has to be on board with the participatory process.

This requires an extremely intuitive and observant leader who acts decisively when conflicts arise among team members.

Participatory leadership traits

Although some democratic leaders are charismatic, many are not.

Because they tend to be highly rational, democratic leaders are often even-keeled.

They are not prone to sweeping inspirational speeches or motivating staff with a gung-ho style aimed at attaining short-term goals.

Democratic/participative leaders are self-confident, but they are also pragmatic.

They surround themselves with like-minded people who set realistic goals and achieve them.

The axiom “train your replacement” may apply best to the democratic leadership style.

Effective democratic leaders are so adept that their staff appears to function well without them.

It would be a mistake, however, to assume that participatory leaders are easily replaced.

The best democratic/participative leaders are great multitaskers.

They are able to handle the challenge of working with experienced people on collaborative teams without losing sight of objectives or deadlines.

Democratic/participative leaders are focused on accomplishing goals.

Productivity is the key to adopting this leadership style.

To be successful, democratic leaders must have productive teams that meet expectations.


2. Laissez-faire leadership

Managers who adopt a laissez-faire leadership style expect accountability from people who report to them.

Whether the laissez-faire leader is a CEO, department director or group manager, he or she expects positive results.

Some people prefer working under autocratic managers because they don’t want to be held responsible for failures.

For these people, a laissez-faire leadership style is a mismatch.

To be successful in an age of daily productivity metrics reporting, laissez-faire leaders need to establish milestones for staff.

This means today’s laissez-faire leaders can no longer be completely hands off.

Contemporary laissez-faire leaders must:

  • Observe group and individual performance
  • Track results and stay on top of issues and problems
  • Give credit where credit is due and encourage individual responsibility

In summary, today’s laissez-faire leaders must delegate authority without losing sight of group objectives and individual performances.


3. Autocratic leadership

Exceptional leaders adopt the style that fits their vision, behavior and personality.

The autocratic leadership style still works well in some institutions, such as the military, manufacturing, restaurants and companies with aggressive sales quotas.

The downside of autocratic leadership

Autocratic leadership isn’t as prevalent as it once was for several reasons.

These include:

Better-educated workforces and the growth of knowledge-based industries that encourage decision-making at all levels

Mentoring as a leadership style, popular among millennials who generally frown on authoritarians

Democratic, laissez-faire and transformative leadership styles that incorporate many levels of decision-makers

The upside to autocratic leadership

As we move further into the 21st century, now is a good time to reassess the age-old benefits of autocratic leadership.

People who dislike this style often point to its demoralizing “my way or the highway” mentality.

But we shouldn’t be quick to abandon autocratic leadership when it’s appropriate.

Even creative businesses, such as advertising, product design and social media that reach a point when autocratic leadership is necessary.

When a marketing campaign, advertising program or product design moves into the launch phase, for example, its success or failure hinges on precision timing.

That’s where autocratic leadership comes into play.

Whether it’s an athletic shoe company like Nike or a social media powerhouse like Facebook, autocratic leadership is sometimes vital.

Autocratic leaders help guarantee deadlines are met by training people properly to assume responsibility for their respective roles and to reach their goals.

At the end of the day, autocratic leadership shares the same objectives as other styles.

It’s all about achieving success.

4. Charismatic leadership

The world needs charismatic leaders because they fight for quality of life and a better world.

Charismatic leaders have the courage of their convictions.

They are willing to stand up to people who have a differing view of society or the organization.

Charismatic leaders tend to be able to see the gaps between what an organization delivers to its workers and what the workers need from the organization.

They create visions that their supporters can readily see, and in return the supporters are motivated to contribute to a common goal.


5. Transformational leadership

One of the best uses of transformational leadership style is in an organization that is outdated and requires serious retooling.

It is also a perfect match for a small company that has big dreams and wants to change and adapt to get there.

In both of these examples, the board of directors can bring in a transformational leader who will change the structure of the organization and also motivate the current workers to buy into the new direction.

6. Relations-oriented leadership

Leadership is a prerequisite for many career paths.

Unfortunately, adopting a personal leadership style isn’t easy.

Fortunately, leadership is an acquired skill.

It can be learned through practice and by interacting with experts.

Yesterday’s people-oriented leaders

People-oriented leaders have existed for centuries, but the concept of relations-oriented leadership is relatively modern.

It emerged more than 50 years ago when Fiedler began exploring different leadership styles beyond the widely accepted authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire models.

After Fiedler developed his contingency models, organizational psychologists started comparing relations-and task-oriented leadership.

As Fiedler theorized, most successful leaders do not fall into one category or the other.

They blend people-or task-orientated styles with different techniques, including transformational and situational leadership.

As the U.S. economy gains momentum, companies and organizations are continuing to hire full-time employees.

This creates a need for leaders at all levels who can spearhead short-term projects while implementing long-range road maps.

Although demand for task-oriented leaders and project managers will probably grow, those with people-oriented skills have an advantage if they can integrate a blend of styles, including relations-oriented leadership.


7. Transactional leadership

There is definitely a place for transactional leadership in the world today.

One of its best uses is in multinational corporations where not all of the workers speak the same language.

Once the structure and the requirements are learned, it is easy for workers to complete tasks successfully.

This works because transactional leadership is simple to learn and does not require extensive training.

The transactional approach is easy to understand and apply across much of an organization.

The military, policing organizations, and first responders use this style of leadership so that all areas of the organization are consistent.

It is also easier to apply in a crisis situation, where everyone must know exactly what is required of them and how a task is to be done under pressure.

To many people, money and perks are a powerful motivator.

Many people need a job to pay the bills.

They have other obligations and distractions and would just as soon know exactly how to do their job in order to keep it and reap the rewards.


8. Situational leadership

Hersey and Blanchard found it fruitless to provide one answer to this question.

Everything depends on the specific situation, which is why they collaborated to develop the situational leadership model.

Situational leadership means “choosing the right leadership style for the right people,” according to Blanchard and Hersey.

It also depends on the competence and maturity of the followers.

This is a time in history when leaders look less like bosses and more like partners.

9. Servant leadership

The Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership points to Ann McGee-Cooper and Duane Trammell as contemporary experts who expand on the theme of inspiring others.

The authors of “Focus on Leadership” conclude that servant leaders exhibit these five practices:

  • Listening without judgment
  • Being authentic, open and accountable
  • Building community and showing appreciation
  • Sharing power
  • Developing people


10. Bureaucratic leadership

Governments and billion-dollar companies cannot function without some form of bureaucracy.

Entrepreneurs who want to grow their businesses from one store to a thousand rely on bureaucratic management as well.

This leadership style lends itself to structure, rules, and policies.

It is most successful when staffed by people who are comfortable knowing what to expect and what is expected of them.

It’s also required for organizations that depend on consistent results, like police departments, auto manufacturers and banks.

Bureaucratic leadership depends on a strict structure for management and the need to create quality, consistent output from the workers.

11. Innovative leadership

Innovative leadership is used in Silicon Valley companies, including Google, Tesla and Netflix.

Companies nationwide realize that surviving in the 21st century means changing, adapting, and being more creative than the competition.

12. Task-oriented leadership

Task-oriented leadership is best used in environments where products or services are complex and require many complicated, integrated projects or when strict organization, attention to detail, and meeting milestones are important.

Simon Sinek: How great leaders inspire action

Here is a great article to read on: Benefits of Leadership

Read my latest blog on: The Pros and Cons of Different Leadership Styles

(NOTE: if you want to follow my personal formula to building irresistible brand in the network marketing business and making it unnecessary to pitch randomly people on Facebook, family and friends ever again? PLUS you will discover our Automatic Downline Builder Program. Click Here for INSTANT ACCESS)

Automatic Downline Builder Banner

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2016 Maria Barina Live
(Visited 147 times, 1 visits today)

About Maria Barina

Maria Barina is a mother and grandmother who worked for the NYC Board of Education as Laboratory Specialist Bio/GS for 26yrs till the age of 56. Her husband, after 37 of marriage, passed away from Lung Cancer. She came to myEmpirePRO to seek guidance on how to get freedom that an online business can provide. Freedom to her is being able to do what she wants, when she wants to and to show others they can do the same to. Since she done that she is able to do this by working anywhere she goes and became a mobile-prenuer

One thought on “The Benefits of Different Leadership Styles

  1. Pingback: Quotes from Different Leadership Styles | Maria Barina Live

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *